ReviewBoard 2.0.6发布了,改进内容如下:
新特性 可用性改进 All edit fields on the review request page now have OK/Cancel buttons, in order to prevent confusion about how to save or cancel editing (Bug #3474) Modal boxes (such as the file upload dialog) now appear and fade in the background faster.
Bug 修复 Markdown Review Requests Fixed a breakage that resulted in posting changes using RBTools with a blank commit ID. Fixed a regression in 2.0.5 where the height of the text fields could overflow the height of the review request box. Prevented some text from jumping when going in/out of edit mode for fields. Fixed the display of unfocused editors in file attachment thumbnails.
Diff Viewer 文件关联 New Review Request Page The list of commits is no longer cached so aggressively, meaning that new commits will show up in the list quicker. (Bug #3511) Fixed uploading diffs on Internet Explorer. (Bug #3441)
Subversion SVN credentials are now passed in the request to verify a self-signed certificate, fixing some problems people had with verification. SVN keywords are now handled in a case-insensitive way, preventing issues when keywords were added in all uppercase or lowercase. Fixed unicode issues when processing errors from PySVN. (Bug #3518) Fixed a crash with Subvertpy when handling file paths ending in a slash. Patch by Georgy Dyuldin
管理 扩展 同时发布的还有 1.7.28 版: 安全更新此版本 Django 1.4.14 以及以上版本,详情请看 security vulnerabilities found。 新特性Added the condensediffs management command. Review Board 1.7.x introduced a new storage mechanism for diff data, which can cut down on the size of the data stored in the database. This new mechanism was used for newly-posted diffs, but old data was still in the previous format. Old diffs will now be migrated to the new format whenever they are accessed, or the entire database can be converted at once usingrb-site manage /path/to/site condensediffs.
Bug 修复SVN keywords are now handled in a case-insensitive way, preventing issues when keywords were added in all uppercase or lowercase. File attachment mimetypes are now guessed if the browser doesn’t have a specific mimetype to show us, or sent us an invalid mimetype. (Bug #2269,Bug #3427) Administrators (or those with the“Can Change Status” permission) can now re-open discarded review requests. (Bug #2989)
代码审查(Code Review)不但可以提高质量,而且还是一个知识共享和指导的极好的手段。不幸的是,准备工作的辛苦和工具支持的缺乏让代码审查很容易被延至“稍后再议”。Review Board的目标便是改变这一现状,它所提供的应用程序可以支持代码审查流程。
|